General
Best TMS for Multimodal Logistics Operations: Top Solutions Compared (2026)
Key Takeaways
- A genuinely multimodal TMS covers six core modules: rating and procurement across modes, multimodal planning and optimization, execution workflows, real-time visibility across all legs, freight audit and payment automation, and analytics with carrier scorecards
- Enterprise TMS platforms excel at planning and procurement. Most leave gaps in AI-driven dynamic re-optimization, real-time exception management across modes, and last-mile orchestration, which is where an AI orchestration layer adds the most value
- The right TMS depends on vertical fit, modal mix, and operational scale. Global shippers, 3PLs, retail enterprises, and mid-market operations each need different platform architectures and evaluate different capability dimensions
- Locus operates as an AI-powered orchestration layer that extends any TMS by adding dynamic dispatch, real-time multimodal visibility, and last-mile execution. Recognized #1 in Route Planning in G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards and a Gartner Representative Vendor for Last-Mile Delivery Technology Solutions for five consecutive years
Enterprises running multimodal logistics across road, rail, air, ocean, and last-mile frequently manage these modes in disconnected systems, creating blind spots, cost leakage, and OTIF failures across legs.
North American companies alone hold 38.8% of global TMS market share, yet most deployments still fail to unify multimodal operations under a single optimization layer.
This guide compares the best TMS for multimodal logistics operations, explains what separates a capable TMS from a true multimodal orchestration platform, and gives logistics leaders a structured framework for building a shortlist or RFP.
How to Evaluate TMS Platforms for Multimodal Logistics Operations in 2026
A genuinely multimodal TMS covers these six modules. Each breaks down without cross-modal integration, costing enterprises in freight spend, planning time, or compliance exposure:
| Module | What it does | Why it breaks without multimodal integration |
| Rating and procurement | Captures tariffs, spot quotes, and accessorials across road, rail, air, and ocean | Without unified rating, planners default to the familiar carrier rather than the optimal mode, inflating freight spend by 15-20% |
| Multimodal planning and optimization | Mode selection, multi-stop load building, constraint management across legs | Siloed planning produces mode decisions that optimize each leg independently, missing consolidation and intermodal savings |
| Execution workflows | Tendering, dock and yard management, appointment scheduling, exception management | 35.9% of companies cite manual tasks and 34.1% cite congestion as top yard-management issues; execution failures cascade across downstream legs |
| Shipment visibility | Real-time event management and status tracking across all legs and carriers | Mode-specific visibility leaves 3-4 hour blind spots between ocean port gate-out and last-mile dispatch |
| Freight audit and payment | 3-way match, automated dispute workflows, carrier invoice reconciliation | Manual freight audit typically recovers only 60-70% of overcharges; automation raises recovery to 95%+ |
| Analytics and KPI reporting | Lane analytics, carrier scorecards, mode mix performance, emissions data | Without unified analytics, cost-per-mode and OTIF-per-carrier data lives in separate dashboards with no cross-modal view |
Five evaluation dimensions for shortlisting
Before reviewing vendors:
- Multimodal coverage establishes which modes and geographies the platform handles natively vs. through third-party integrations
- Real-time visibility depth determines whether the control tower consolidates events across all legs or surfaces mode-by-mode
- AI and optimization depth separates static rule-based mode selection from dynamic, ML-driven carrier and mode allocation
- Route optimization can cut fuel costs by up to 20% for fleets using live signals
- Integration architecture confirms how the TMS connects to ERP, WMS, OMS, and carrier APIs without custom middleware at each touchpoint
Vertical fit determines whether the platform’s built-in workflows reflect your industry’s specific requirements. A transport management system (TMS) optimized for industrial bulk shippers carries different strengths than one built for retail omnichannel or 3PL multi-client environments.
Best TMS for Multimodal Logistics in 2026: At a Glance
Here is a summary of the best TMS for multimodal logistics operations.
| Platform | Category | AI depth | Modal coverage | Best-fit use case |
| Locus | AI orchestration layer | Advanced | All-mile + carrier | Enterprise: retail, FMCG, e-commerce, 3PL; dynamic dispatch and last-mile orchestration over any TMS |
| Oracle OTM | Enterprise TMS | Moderate | All modes global | Global shippers: ocean, air, road, rail with multi-modal rate and compliance management |
| Blue Yonder TMS | TMS + planning | Moderate | TL, LTL, intermodal | Retail and CPG: planning-to-execution continuity with OTIF and carrier collaboration |
| SAP TM | Enterprise TMS | Moderate | Multi-modal | SAP-ecosystem enterprises: freight cost management, compliance, ERP integration |
| Descartes | TMS + compliance | Moderate | All modes + cross-border | 3PLs and regulated industries: multi-client carrier management, compliance, cross-border |
| Manhattan Associates TMS | TMS + WMS/OMS | Moderate | Inbound + last-mile | Retail omnichannel: inbound freight, DC-to-store, consumer-facing visibility |
| Infios (MercuryGate) | Mid-to-large TMS | Moderate | TL, LTL, intermodal, ocean/air | Mid-to-large domestic and international shippers: unified TMS and WMS |
| Rose Rocket | AI-native TMS | Moderate | TL, LTL, brokerage | Mid-market carriers, brokers, and 3PLs: AI-native workflows with fast deployment |
Caption: Platforms ordered by Locus orchestration layer first, then enterprise TMS alphabetically, then mid-market options.
1. Locus
Locus operates as an AI-powered logistics orchestration platform that sits above existing TMS, WMS, ERP, and carrier systems, adding dynamic mode and carrier selection, real-time multimodal visibility, and exception-driven automated dispatch on top of existing transport infrastructure.
It covers all-mile logistics: middle mile, last mile, returns, and both B2B and B2C delivery. The Fireworks routing engine processes 250+ operational constraints simultaneously with continuous intra-day re-optimization.
ShipFlex manages carrier allocation across 160+ active carriers from a broader network of 1,000+ pre-integrated partners. The Control Tower consolidates visibility and exception management across all legs.
Across 350+ enterprise customers in 30+ countries, Locus has driven $320M+ in logistics cost savings with 99.5% SLA adherence. It has also been backed by Ingka Group since October 2025.
Key features of Locus
- Fireworks routing engine: 250+ constraint processing with continuous re-optimization across all-mile logistics including middle mile, last mile, and returns
- DispatchIQ: AI-powered carrier-order matching using live cost, SLA, and capacity signals across owned fleet and 3PL partners simultaneously
- ShipFlex: Multi-carrier orchestration across 160+ carriers from a network of 1,000+ pre-integrated partners with SLA-tier allocation rules
- Control Tower: Real-time multimodal shipment visibility with predictive ETAs, automated exception alerts, and plan-vs-actual analytics
Locus pros
- Recognized #1 in Route Planning in G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards and a Gartner Representative Vendor for five consecutive years
- Closes the AI dispatch and last-mile execution gaps that all TMS platforms leave open, without requiring an actual TMS replacement
- Mycroft AI Co-Pilot surfaces dispatch summaries, exception alerts, and re-routing actions through natural language for dispatchers and operations teams
Locus cons
- Designed for enterprise-scale multimodal complexity; single-mode fleets with simple, predictable routing patterns will not require the full orchestration depth
Locus pricing
Custom enterprise pricing by order volume and deployment scope. Schedule a demo for a tailored estimate.
Locus is best for
Enterprise shippers, retailers, FMCG distributors, and 3PLs managing multi-node, multi-carrier, multimodal networks where dynamic last-mile execution, real-time visibility, and AI dispatch automation complement an existing TMS investment.
2. Oracle Transportation Management (OTM)
Oracle Transportation Management is the enterprise standard for global shippers requiring deep rate management across all modes. Its freight sourcing, bid management, routing guide management, and carrier contract lifecycle tools handle the complexity of global multimodal procurement.
Integration with Oracle SCM Cloud and Oracle Fusion connects transportation planning to financial settlement and supply chain visibility.
Key features of Oracle Transportation Management
- Global multimodal freight planning: TL, LTL, ocean, air, rail, and intermodal with routing guide management
- Freight sourcing and bid management with carrier contract lifecycle and rate management
- Global trade compliance documentation for cross-border carrier management
Oracle Transportation Management pros
- Deepest global multimodal rate management and freight procurement capabilities of any platform on this list
- Tight Oracle ERP integration eliminates freight cost reconciliation friction for Oracle-ecosystem enterprises
Oracle Transportation Management cons
- Implementation timelines of 12-18 months and high total cost of ownership require large, dedicated IT resources
Oracle Transportation Management pricing
Custom enterprise pricing. Factor system integrator fees alongside licence costs.
Oracle Transportation Management is best for
Large global enterprises managing ocean, air, road, and rail freight with complex compliance, rate management, and Oracle ERP integration requirements.
Locus integration note
Locus extends Oracle OTM’s planning and procurement strength with AI-driven last-mile dispatch and real-time cross-mode visibility, covering the dynamic execution layer where Oracle OTM leaves off.
3. Blue Yonder Transportation Management
Blue Yonder extends its AI-driven supply chain planning heritage into carrier selection, load optimization, and freight procurement.
Its planning-to-execution continuity is the primary differentiator for retail and CPG shippers: demand forecasts, replenishment plans, and carrier allocations share the same data model, reducing the handoff gaps that create OTIF failures.
The freight procurement module covers bid management and carrier collaboration, with OTIF compliance tracking that addresses specific retailer mandate requirements.
Key features of Blue Yonder Transportation Management
- AI-assisted carrier selection and load optimization tied to demand and replenishment planning
- Freight procurement with bid management and carrier collaboration portal
- Integration with Blue Yonder supply chain planning, WMS, and OMS suite
Blue Yonder Transportation Management pros
- Planning-to-execution continuity for retail and CPG shippers already invested in Blue Yonder’s supply chain suite
- OTIF compliance tools handle retailer mandate requirements that generic TMS platforms require custom configuration to address
Blue Yonder Transportation Management cons
- Differentiation is strongest within the Blue Yonder planning ecosystem
- Standalone deployment underutilizes the platform’s planning integration advantage
Blue Yonder Transportation Management pricing
Custom enterprise pricing. Most deployments are part of broader Blue Yonder suite contracts.
Blue Yonder Transportation Management is best for
Retail and CPG enterprises with high-volume domestic multimodal distribution, OTIF compliance requirements, and existing Blue Yonder supply chain planning relationships.
Locus integration note
Locus adds AI-driven last-mile execution and predictive exception handling to Blue Yonder’s inbound and mid-mile planning strength, closing the gap between the planning layer and the consumer-facing delivery experience.
4. SAP Transportation Management
SAP Transportation Management covers carrier selection, multimodal freight order management, subcontracting, and financial settlement within SAP S/4HANA. Freight costs flow directly into the SAP P&L without manual reconciliation.
The platform handles TL, LTL, ocean, air, and rail within the SAP ecosystem, with compliance documentation and audit trail capabilities that regulated industries require.
Key features of SAP Transportation Management
- Multimodal freight order management: TL, LTL, ocean, air, and rail within SAP S/4HANA
- Freight agreement and carrier contract management with settlement and cost allocation automation
- SAP Event Management for shipment milestone tracking and carrier performance monitoring
- Compliance documentation and audit trail within the SAP financial ledger
SAP Transportation Management pros
- Freight costs and carrier settlements flow directly into SAP P&L, eliminating manual reconciliation for SAP-native enterprises
- Enterprise-grade compliance and audit trail for regulated multimodal operations
SAP Transportation Management cons
- Rigid architecture makes dynamic carrier network expansion slow
- AI-native dynamic re-optimization requires third-party augmentation
SAP Transportation Management pricing
Contact SAP or a certified partner for transportation-specific pricing.
SAP Transportation Management is best for
SAP-native enterprises in manufacturing, CPG, and retail that prioritize freight cost management, financial integration, and compliance documentation within an existing SAP S/4HANA environment.
Locus integration note
Locus sits above SAP TM as the AI execution layer, adding dynamic last-mile routing, real-time exception management, and carrier re-allocation capabilities that SAP TM handles through static rule sets.
5. Descartes Systems Group
Descartes Systems Group provides multimodal TMS coverage alongside global trade compliance, carrier network connectivity, and compliance management.
Its acquisition of 3GTMS added modern cloud-native shipper-focused TMS capabilities across TL, LTL, and parcel.
Its carrier compliance tools cover insurance verification, safety scores, and cross-border documentation across one of the largest carrier databases available.
Key features of Descartes Systems Group
- Multi-client 3PL TMS with configurable SLA rules, billing, and routing preferences per shipper client
- Global carrier network with EDI/API onboarding and compliance management: insurance, safety scores, FMCSA documentation
- Multimodal freight optimization: TL, LTL, parcel, intermodal, and cross-border
- Supply chain compliance and audit trail for regulated industries including pharma and food distribution
Descartes Systems Group pros
- Named top cloud-based TMS by ARC Advisory Group 2025; deepest carrier compliance infrastructure of any platform on this list
- 3PL multi-client architecture handles differentiated SLAs across shipper clients without per-client custom development
Descartes Systems Group cons
- AI-native continuous re-optimization and last-mile orchestration are less developed than orchestration-first platforms
- Implementation timelines run long for full-suite deployments
Descartes Systems Group pricing
Contact Descartes for a deployment-scoped proposal.
Descartes Systems Group is best for
3PLs managing multi-client multimodal SLAs across mixed carrier networks, and regulated-industry enterprises requiring carrier compliance and cross-border documentation at scale.
Locus integration note
Locus provides Descartes-deployed 3PLs with a unified control tower across all client accounts and modes, giving operations teams a single exception management and visibility layer rather than client-by-client dashboards.
6. Manhattan Associates Transportation Management
Manhattan Associates Transportation Management is purpose-built for retail and omnichannel logistics. Its inbound freight management, DC-to-store routing, and integration with Manhattan’s WMS and OMS create a continuous supply chain execution layer from vendor shipment through store receipt.
The platform handles the specific multimodal patterns retail enterprises manage: consolidating ocean and air inbound freight at import DCs, routing linehaul to regional distribution, and scheduling store-level delivery windows.
Key features of Manhattan Associates TMS
- Inbound freight management from vendor to DC with ocean, air, and domestic linehaul visibility
- DC-to-store and DC-to-customer routing with store-level delivery window scheduling
- Omnichannel order fulfillment support integrating with Manhattan WMS and OMS
- Carrier management and load building with WMS-aligned appointment scheduling
Manhattan Associates TMS pros
- Deepest retail omnichannel supply chain integration of any platform on this list, connecting inbound, DC operations, and outbound routing in a single data model
- Store-level delivery scheduling reflects the specific retail requirement that generic TMS platforms address through configuration workarounds
Manhattan Associates TMS cons
- Strongest within the Manhattan Associates WMS/OMS ecosystem
- Standalone deployment reduces the planning integration advantage
Manhattan Associates TMS pricing
Custom enterprise pricing. Contact the vendor for a quote.
Manhattan Associates TMS is best for
Retail and FMCG enterprises managing multimodal inbound freight, DC distribution, and omnichannel fulfillment within an existing or planned Manhattan Associates supply chain stack.
Locus integration note
Locus bridges Manhattan Associates’ inbound and mid-mile planning strength with dynamic, AI-driven last-mile execution and consumer-facing visibility, covering the peak-season last-mile orchestration gap that most retail TMS deployments leave unaddressed.
7. Infios (MercuryGate)
Infios is the supply chain execution platform formed by Körber Supply Chain Software’s acquisition of MercuryGate.
It brings MercuryGate’s multi-modal TMS (TL, LTL, parcel, intermodal, rail, air, ocean) together with Körber’s WMS on a single data model, eliminating the warehouse-to-transportation handoff gaps that separate TMS and WMS vendors create.
With 5,000+ customers across 70+ countries, Infios serves mid-to-large shippers needing configurable multi-modal freight management with freight audit capabilities that recover carrier billing discrepancies directly against margins.
Key features of Infios TMS
- Multi-modal freight planning and carrier management: TL, LTL, parcel, intermodal, rail, air, and ocean
- Unified TMS and WMS on one platform, reducing warehouse-to-transportation integration complexity
- Freight audit and payment automation across carrier invoices with discrepancy detection and recovery
- Configurable rating engine and load tendering with carrier acceptance tracking
Infios TMS pros
- Unified TMS and WMS architecture removes the data handoff gap between warehouse and transportation that multi-vendor deployments create
- Multi-modal freight audit capabilities directly recover margin: a primary commercial objective for both shippers and 3PLs
Infios TMS cons
- AI-native dynamic re-optimization and last-mile orchestration are less advanced than orchestration-first platforms
Infios TMS pricing
Contact Infios for a quote based on shipment volume and module scope.
Infios TMS is best for
Mid-to-large domestic and international shippers who need multi-modal TMS alongside WMS in a unified platform, particularly where freight audit ROI is a primary buying criterion.
Locus integration note
Locus adds AI-powered last-mile dispatch and continuous route re-optimization to Infios’s multi-modal planning foundation, extending the platform’s transportation coverage through the final delivery leg.
Also read: From Legacy TMS to AI-Native: The Modernization Playbook
8. Rose Rocket (TMS.ai)
Rose Rocket operates as an AI-native TMS (now branded TMS.ai) built for freight carriers, brokers, and 3PLs who need modern, configurable freight management without the implementation overhead of tier-1 enterprise platforms.
Its AI agents reduce manual data entry and dispatcher workload across the order lifecycle. The platform processed $2.7 billion in freight in 2024 and guarantees a 90-day go-live.
Key features of Rose Rocket
- AI-native email-to-order automation via TED, eliminating manual order entry from carrier and customer communications
- Dispatch, tendering, and carrier management with customer and partner portals
- Freight audit and payment with AI-powered invoice validation against contracted rates
- Real-time shipment visibility and driver mobile app with ELD compliance support
Rose Rocket pros
- 90-day go-live guarantee and fast deployment reduce implementation risk for mid-market operations
- AI-native order management agents reduce manual dispatcher workload across the freight order lifecycle
Rose Rocket cons
- Built for mid-market carriers, brokers, and 3PLs
- Enterprises managing high-volume multimodal networks with complex carrier diversity and multi-country operations will require a tier-1 TMS
Rose Rocket pricing
Starts at $2,080/month.
Rose Rocket is best for
Mid-market freight carriers, brokers, and 3PLs that need a cloud-native, AI-assisted TMS with fast deployment, modern UX, and freight audit capabilities without tier-1 TMS implementation complexity.
Locus integration note
Locus can be deployed alongside Rose Rocket to add AI dispatch, dynamic multimodal routing, and real-time visibility without requiring a TMS replacement, extending the platform’s freight management capabilities into enterprise-grade orchestration as operations scale.
Beyond TMS: Why Multimodal Enterprises Need an AI Orchestration Layer
Three structural gaps persist across TMS deployments that the logistics orchestration platform category was built to close:
1. The TMS coverage gap
Even the best TMS manages planning and procurement well. Port delays, carrier capacity failures, and intraday weather events require dynamic re-optimization across modes as conditions shift, and most TMS platforms respond through dispatcher manual intervention rather than automated real-time re-allocation.
The AI route optimization layer that closes this gap operates at sub-minute re-optimization cycles, not planning-time batch windows.
2. The visibility fragmentation problem
Enterprises running multiple regional TMS platforms, 3PL networks, and carrier systems end up with siloed event data that no single TMS consolidates. Each mode has its own tracking feed. Each region has its own exception workflow.
Real-time shipment visibility across all legs in a single control tower gives operations teams the cross-modal picture that fragmented TMS dashboards cannot assemble in real time.
3. The AI dispatch gap
Static rule-based routing in most TMS platforms cannot dynamically re-assign loads across modes and carriers based on live cost, capacity, and SLA signals. AI-powered dispatch and routing resolves carrier-order matching continuously, updating assignments as conditions change without requiring dispatcher intervention at each event.
Locus integrates with leading TMS, WMS, ERP, and carrier systems via API-first architecture, adding this orchestration capability without requiring platform replacement.
For enterprises with existing Oracle OTM, SAP TM, or Blue Yonder deployments, Locus adds the dynamic execution and visibility layer those platforms do not provide natively.
Similarly, for enterprises running Descartes or Manhattan Associates, Locus provides a unified control tower across all client accounts and modes. For mid-market operations on Infios or Rose Rocket, Locus adds enterprise-grade AI orchestration while the existing TMS handles freight management.
How to Choose the Right TMS and Orchestration Layer for Your Multimodal Network
Four decision paths based on operational profile:
| If you are… | Prioritize | Key evaluation focus |
| A global shipper managing ocean, air, and road across multiple regions | Oracle OTM or SAP TM as the planning foundation, with Locus for last-mile and dynamic re-routing | Global rate management, compliance, ERP integration depth, and plan-vs-actual feedback capability |
| A retail or FMCG enterprise managing inbound freight through to last-mile delivery | Blue Yonder or Manhattan Associates for planning-to-distribution continuity, with Locus for AI dispatch and consumer-facing visibility | WMS/OMS integration, OTIF compliance tools, and peak-season last-mile orchestration for promotional spikes |
| A 3PL managing multi-client multimodal SLAs across mixed carrier networks | Descartes for multi-client carrier management, with Locus as the unified control tower across all accounts and modes | Per-client SLA configurability, billing automation, and cross-mode exception management without client-by-client dashboards |
| A mid-market enterprise scaling from spreadsheets into structured multimodal operations | Infios or Rose Rocket for the freight management foundation, with Locus to add AI optimization without a full TMS replacement | Cloud-native deployment speed, freight audit ROI, API integration flexibility, and a clear growth path to enterprise-scale orchestration as stop volume and modal complexity increase |
The enterprises that will win on multimodal logistics in the next 3-5 years combine strong transport planning with AI-driven, real-time orchestration across every mode and leg.
A TMS without an AI orchestration layer is a planning system. A TMS paired with AI orchestration becomes a decision system, adapting in real time to disruptions that static rule sets cannot resolve.
Choosing the Best TMS for Your Multimodal Logistics Network
No single TMS delivers perfect multimodal coverage across planning, execution, visibility, and AI-driven optimization.
The right choice depends on your network’s modal mix, vertical, and scale. The enterprises extracting the most value from multimodal logistics pair a best-fit TMS with an AI orchestration layer that closes the execution and visibility gaps common to every platform on this list.
Schedule a demo to see how Locus integrates with your existing TMS to deliver end-to-end multimodal orchestration, AI dispatch, and real-time supply chain visibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What is the difference between a TMS and a multimodal logistics orchestration platform?
A TMS manages transportation workflows: mode selection, carrier tendering, load planning, freight audit, and settlement. A multimodal logistics orchestration platform extends this by driving real-time execution decisions: AI-powered carrier re-allocation when disruptions occur, continuous route re-optimization across all legs as conditions change, unified control tower visibility across all modes and carriers, and last-mile dispatch automation without manual intervention at each event. A TMS answers “which carrier and mode?” at planning time. An orchestration platform answers that question continuously throughout execution.
Q2: Can a TMS manage both first-mile inbound freight and last-mile delivery in a single system?
Most enterprise TMS platforms cover inbound freight well: ocean, air, and domestic linehaul planning, carrier tendering, and DC-level visibility. Last-mile delivery orchestration, including dynamic re-routing, consumer-facing ETA updates, proof of delivery, and exception management at the stop level, sits outside the primary design scope of most TMS platforms. Retailers and FMCG enterprises typically deploy a TMS for inbound and mid-mile planning and a last-mile orchestration platform for the final delivery leg, connecting them through API integration.
Q3: How does AI improve route and mode optimization in multimodal transportation management?
Static TMS platforms select routes and modes based on rules configured at deployment time. AI-powered optimization continuously updates decisions as conditions change: re-routing around port congestion before a vessel docks, re-allocating a shipment from air to expedited rail when capacity signals indicate a cost advantage, and dynamically re-dispatching last-mile deliveries when a carrier rejects a load or traffic conditions change. The practical outcome is lower total freight spend through smarter mode mix decisions and fewer manual exception escalations, which directly reduces dispatcher labor costs.
Q4: What integrations should a TMS have to support multimodal logistics operations at enterprise scale?
At enterprise scale, a multimodal TMS should integrate bidirectionally with: ERP systems (SAP, Oracle) for financial cost allocation and purchase order management; WMS platforms for dock scheduling, load sequencing, and shipment readiness signals; OMS for order visibility and customer commitment management; carrier APIs across all active modes for real-time tendering, tracking, and invoice exchange; and telematics or visibility network providers for cross-carrier event consolidation. Integration depth should be verified with named pre-built connectors, not generic API availability claims, before shortlisting.
Q5: How do 3PLs manage multimodal SLAs for multiple clients using a single TMS platform?
3PLs managing multi-client multimodal operations need TMS platforms with configurable per-client SLA rules, routing guides, and carrier preferences. Descartes and Infios both support multi-client TMS configuration natively. The operational complexity grows when modes and carriers vary by client: a shipper requiring refrigerated LTL and another requiring intermodal parcel on the same platform create exception management workflows that require a unified control tower rather than client-by-client dashboards. Locus addresses this by providing a single visibility and exception management layer across all client accounts and modes, regardless of which TMS handles the underlying freight management.
General
Best Dispatch Management Platforms for Small and Mid-Sized Logistics Providers in 2026
Jun 22, 2026
Comparing dispatch management platforms for small to mid-size logistics providers? This guide covers 10 tools by fleet size, complexity, and AI capability.
Read more
General
Micro-Fulfillment Meets Macro-Routing: Profitable Same-Day Delivery in Highly Congested Cities
Jun 22, 2026
Profitable same-day delivery in congested cities depends on three architectural mechanisms: continuous batching, micromobility integration with LEZ compliance, and inventory proximity exploited by hyperlocal routing. A framework for urban last-mile operational leaders in 2026.
Read moreInsights Worth Your Time
Best TMS for Multimodal Logistics Operations: Top Solutions Compared (2026)