Ingka Group acquires Locus! Built for the real world, backed for the long run. Read here>Read the full story>
Ingka Group acquires Locus! Built for the real world, backed for the long run. Read the full story
locus-logo-dark
Schedule a demo
Locus Logo Locus Logo
  • Platform
    • Transportation Management System
    • Last Mile Delivery Solution
  • Products
    • Fulfillment Automation
      • Order Management
      • Delivery Linked Checkout
    • Dispatch Planning
      • Hub Operations
      • Capacity Management
      • Route Planning
    • Delivery Orchestration
      • Transporter Management
      • ShipFlex
    • Track and Trace
      • Driver Companion App
      • Control Tower
      • Tracking Page
    • Analytics and Insights
      • Business Insights
      • Location Analytics
  • Industries
    • Retail
    • FMCG/CPG
    • 3PL & CEP
    • Big & Bulky
    • Other Industries
      • E-commerce
      • E-grocery
      • Industrial Services
      • Manufacturing
      • Home Services
  • Resources
    • Guides
      • Reducing Cart Abandonment
      • Reducing WISMO Calls
      • Logistics Trends 2024
      • Unit Economics in All-mile
      • Last Mile Delivery Logistics
      • Last Mile Delivery Trends
      • Time Under the Roof
      • Peak Shipping Season
      • Electronic Products
      • Fleet Management
      • Healthcare Logistics
      • Transport Management System
      • E-commerce Logistics
      • Direct Store Delivery
      • Logistics Route Planner Guide
    • ROI Calculator
    • Product Demos
    • Whitepaper
    • Case Studies
    • Infographics
    • E-books
    • Blogs
    • Events & Webinars
    • Videos
    • API Reference Docs
    • Glossary
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Global Presence
      • Locus in Americas
      • Locus in Asia Pacific
      • Locus in the Middle East
    • Analyst Recognition
    • Careers
    • News & Press
    • Trust & Security
    • Contact Us
  • Customers
en  
en - English
id - Bahasa
Schedule a demo
  1. Home
  2. Blog
  3. Fleet Utilization and the Cost of Idle Time: A CFO Framework for Fresh Produce Peak Shipping

General

Fleet Utilization and the Cost of Idle Time: A CFO Framework for Fresh Produce Peak Shipping

Avatar photo

Ishan Bhattacharya

Sep 1, 2026

12 mins read

Key Takeaways

  • Idle time is the most expensive category of fleet cost because it consumes the two largest lines, driver and equipment, and produces nothing.
  • At peak the composition changes. Idle shifts from gaps between assignments to queuing at origin and destination, and deadhead shifts from directional imbalance to repositioning under time pressure.
  • Fleet utilization is the only capacity lever available during harvest, because adding vehicles takes longer than the season lasts and spot capacity is priced accordingly.
  • No credible published figure states what utilization recovery is achievable. Build the number from your own idle and deadhead data, which most operations already collect and few segment.
  • Model it as vehicle-days released rather than as cost saved, because that converts directly into absorbed volume or deferred capital.

Why idle time is the most expensive line you do not track

Fleet cost reporting is organised around things you buy: vehicles, fuel, maintenance, insurance, drivers. Idle time is not a purchase, so it has no line, and it is consequently the largest unexamined cost in most fleets.

The reason it is expensive is structural. ATRI’s operational cost data puts average cost at 2.26 dollars per mile in 2024, with driver compensation at roughly 44 percent of operating cost, equipment at roughly 28 percent, and fuel at roughly 21 percent, and records non-fuel marginal costs at a record 1.779 dollars per mile.

Read that composition against an idle vehicle. Driver compensation accrues. Equipment cost accrues. Insurance, financing, and licensing accrue. Only fuel pauses, and fuel is the smallest of the four. Roughly seven tenths of the cost base continues while the asset produces nothing, which makes an idle hour close to a full-cost hour with zero output against it.

The same logic applies to deadhead, with the difference that deadhead also burns fuel. ATRI puts deadhead at approximately 16.7 percent of all truck miles, and notes this share-of-miles figure should be used rather than the commonly repeated claim that a third of trucks run empty, which measures something else.

For a CFO the useful framing is that fleet utilization is not an efficiency metric. It is the ratio between the capacity you are paying for and the capacity you receive, and idle time is the gap.

Also Read: Fleet Utilization Rate: How to Measure it, What Good Looks Like, and How AI Closes the Gap

What changes during a produce surge

Idle and deadhead do not simply increase at peak. Their composition changes, which matters because the response differs.

Steady state idle is mostly gaps between assignments: a vehicle finishing early, waiting for the next load, or held because the plan was built for a different volume than arrived.

Peak idle is queuing. Packhouses run at capacity and dock queues lengthen at origin, while receiving facilities run at capacity and queues lengthen at destination. The vehicle is committed, the driver is on the clock, and neither is moving. This is the category that grows fastest during harvest and the one least visible in a utilization percentage, because the vehicle is technically assigned.

Facility-side dwell is well documented as a cost. ATRI found drivers were detained at 39.3 percent of all stops in 2023, losing between 117 and 209 hours per year depending on sector, at a cost of 3.6 billion dollars in direct expenses and 11.5 billion dollars in lost productivity. During harvest those hours concentrate, and in perishable freight they carry a second cost against the product.

Steady state deadhead is largely directional imbalance, which is structural and only partly addressable.

Peak deadhead is repositioning under time pressure. Volume appears where the plan did not expect it, so vehicles move empty to reach it. That deadhead is a planning artefact rather than a network characteristic, which makes it more addressable than the steady-state kind, and it is created by exactly the volatility harvest produces.

The planning failure behind both is documented. McKinsey has found that static planning models can leave as much as 60 percent of operating hours either understaffed or overstaffed, which describes a harvest operation planning daily against volume that revises hourly.

Why utilization is the only lever at peak

Three of the four ways to add capacity are unavailable once the season starts.

Buying vehicles takes longer than the surge lasts, and leaves you with capacity for eleven months you did not need it.

Hiring drivers faces the same timing problem and a market that does not cooperate. The ATA estimates a US driver shortage of roughly 60,000, projected above 170,000 by 2030, with annual turnover of 90 to 95 percent at large truckload carriers.

Buying spot capacity works and is priced for the moment. DAT data indicates spot rates typically run 15 to 30 percent above contract rates in normal markets and widen at peak, which is when you need them.

Recovering capacity you already own is the fourth, and it is the only one available on a timescale shorter than the season. That is what makes utilization a peak-season lever rather than an annual improvement programme.

Also Read: The Empty-Mile Problem: The Fleet Cost Hiding Behind Healthy Utilization in 2026

Building the model

Four steps, using data most operations hold and few segment. The output is vehicle-days rather than dollars, for a reason covered below.

Step 1: separate idle into categories

Total idle is not actionable. Four categories are, and they have different owners.

CategoryCauseAddressable byTypical owner
Between-assignment idlePlan built against wrong volumeContinuous re-planningDispatch
Origin queuePackhouse or DC dock capacityAppointment sequencing and arrival timingPlanning and supplier
Destination queueReceiving facility capacityAppointment adherence and slot negotiationCustomer-facing ops
Compliance idleRequired rest, unavoidableNot addressable, exclude from the modelNone

Excluding the fourth explicitly matters, because including unavoidable idle in an addressable total is the fastest way to have the model discounted in review.

Step 2: separate deadhead into structural and planning-driven

Structural deadhead follows from network geography and directional imbalance. Planning-driven deadhead follows from repositioning to volume the plan did not anticipate.

Only the second is meaningfully addressable in-season, and at peak it is usually the larger of the two. Segment by whether the empty movement was scheduled in the original plan or created by a re-plan.

Step 3: cost the addressable portion honestly

Apply fully loaded driver and asset rates to idle hours, and fuel plus maintenance to deadhead miles. Use your own rates rather than ATRI’s, which are a US average and a composition reference rather than a cost input for your operation.

Also Read: Fleet Management and Utilization: How AI Architecture Improves Capacity, Cost, and Performance in 2026

Then apply a recovery assumption and label it clearly as an assumption. No credible published figure states what proportion of idle or deadhead is recoverable through better allocation, and circulating percentages trace to software vendors rather than research. Model a conservative share, show the sensitivity, and let the range carry the case.

Step 4: express the result as vehicle-days released

This is the step that makes the model useful. Dollars saved from idle reduction is a soft number, because the cost did not disappear, it was redeployed. Vehicle-days released is a hard number, and it converts directly into either volume absorbed without additional capacity or spot purchases avoided.

For a peak-season case, the second conversion is the strongest, because a vehicle-day recovered in harvest week is a spot purchase not made at a 15 to 30 percent premium.

What to measure, and what not to

Measure utilization as a share of available shift time, not as a share of assigned time. A vehicle queuing at a dock is assigned and not producing, and the second measure hides exactly the category that grows at peak.

Measure idle by category, per the table above. An aggregate figure cannot be assigned to an owner.

Measure deadhead by whether it was planned, which separates structural from addressable.

Measure cost per delivered unit, not only cost per mile. Cost per mile falls when you drive more efficiently and says nothing about whether the asset was full. Cost per delivered unit is the only measure that moves when utilization improves.

Do not benchmark against published utilization figures by vertical. They do not exist at research grade. Private fleet survey data exists behind paywalls and public vendor figures should not appear in a model finance will scrutinise. Your own pre-season baseline is the comparator.

Also Read: How Fleet Utilization Impacts Last-Mile Delivery Costs: Five Economic Mechanisms Enterprise Logistics Leaders Should Understand in 2026

Where cross-fleet orchestration changes the arithmetic

Most produce operations run owned capacity alongside contracted carriers and, increasingly, spot. Utilization is usually measured and managed per pool.

That produces a specific and expensive pattern at peak. Owned capacity is filled first because it is already paid for, the remainder passes to contracted carriers, and what they reject goes to spot. The consequence is that the most expensive marginal capacity is used on the highest-volume days, which is exactly backwards, and it happens because the three pools are allocated in sequence rather than in one decision.

Allocating across all pools simultaneously changes two things. Owned capacity is used where it is genuinely the best fit rather than by default, and spot is purchased for the loads where it is cheapest overall rather than for whatever is left. For a CFO the modelling implication is that cost-mix improvement and utilization improvement are separate numbers with separate mechanisms, and combining them in one line invites double counting.

Where Locus fits

Locus, the world’s first Decision-Intelligent, Agentic TMS, operates on the decisions that determine utilization: how work is allocated, how routes are sequenced, and how the plan changes when volume revises.

Within DiSCO, the Capacity agent forecasts demand and right-sizes available capacity, the Dispatch agent plans and re-sequences against 250+ real-world constraints, the Carrier agent allocates across owned, contracted, and spot capacity in one decision rather than in sequence, and the Hub agent manages facility-side constraints where peak queuing accumulates.

Locus has been recognized by Gartner for seven consecutive years, featured in the 2026 Hype Cycle for Supply Chain Execution and Logistics Technologies, named a Leader in TMS by QKS Group (SPARK Matrix), and ranked #1 in Route Planning on G2’s 2026 Best Software Awards. In October 2025, Ingka Investments, the investment arm of Ingka Group, the world’s largest IKEA retailer, acquired Locus. Locus continues to operate independently.

Two deployments quantify recovered capacity rather than cost saved, which is the form this model uses.

A Fortune 50 parcel and logistics provider ran a single-site capacity analysis that surfaced 565,000 dollars in unused capacity, including premium-tier service given away on cheaper classes, scaling to 14 million dollars-plus annualised across 25 sites. The capacity already existed and was invisible until allocation was instrumented, which is the argument for measuring idle by category rather than in aggregate.

A global FMCG leader operating across ten countries eliminated 12,000+ trips each month through demand-matched capacity and fuller loads, alongside 15 percent less distance travelled and plan run time falling from three hours to five minutes. The trip figure is capacity released; the distance figure is a variable cost saving. Keeping them separate in a model is the discipline that survives review.

Also Read: Predictive Capacity Planning for Peak Season: Building the Cost Model and Business Case in 2026

The pre-season calculation

Before harvest, pull last season’s peak weeks and segment idle hours into the four categories, and deadhead miles into planned and unplanned.

Cost the addressable portion at your own rates, then convert it to vehicle-days and compare that figure against your spot spend for the same weeks. In most produce operations the recovered vehicle-days are worth more than the operation expects, precisely because they are valued at peak spot rates rather than at annual average cost.

That comparison is the business case, and it is available from data you already hold before any platform decision is made.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why is fleet idle time so expensive?

Because it consumes the two largest cost lines and produces nothing. ATRI puts driver compensation at roughly 44 percent of operating cost and equipment at roughly 28 percent, with fuel at roughly 21 percent. During idle, driver, equipment, insurance, and financing all accrue while only fuel pauses, so roughly seven tenths of the cost base continues with zero output against it.

How does idle time change during a produce peak?

Its composition changes rather than only its volume. Steady-state idle is mostly gaps between assignments; peak idle is queuing at packhouses and receiving facilities, where the vehicle is assigned and not moving. That category is invisible in utilization measured as a share of assigned time, which is why it should be measured as a share of available shift time instead.

Why is fleet utilization the only capacity lever during harvest?

Because the other three are unavailable on that timescale. Buying vehicles takes longer than the surge and leaves idle capacity afterwards, hiring faces the same timing problem in a market with 90 to 95 percent turnover at large truckload carriers, and spot capacity is priced for the moment, with DAT indicating spot typically runs 15 to 30 percent above contract and widening at peak. Recovering owned capacity is the only in-season option.

How much fleet capacity can be recovered through better utilization?

No credible published figure exists, and circulating percentages trace to software vendors rather than research firms. Build the number from your own data: segment idle into between-assignment, origin queue, destination queue, and compliance categories, exclude the last as unaddressable, apply a conservative recovery assumption, and show the sensitivity rather than presenting a point estimate.

Should fleet utilization gains be modelled as cost saved or capacity released?

Capacity released, expressed as vehicle-days. Cost saved is a soft number because the cost was redeployed rather than removed, while vehicle-days convert directly into volume absorbed without additional capacity or spot purchases avoided. For a peak-season case the second conversion is strongest, since a vehicle-day recovered during harvest replaces a spot purchase at a premium.

Why does allocating owned capacity first cost money at peak?

Because filling owned capacity by default and passing the remainder to contracted carriers and then spot means the most expensive marginal capacity is used on the highest-volume days. Allocating across all three pools in one decision uses owned capacity where it genuinely fits best and buys spot for the loads where it is cheapest overall, which is a cost-mix improvement distinct from a utilization improvement.

MEET THE AUTHOR
Avatar photo
Ishan Bhattacharya
Lead - Content

Ishan, a knowledge navigator at heart, has more than a decade crafting content strategies for B2B tech, with a strong focus on logistics SaaS. He blends AI with human creativity to turn complex ideas into compelling narratives.

Related Tags:

Previous Post Next Post

General

The Agentic TMS Stack: What Changes When the AI Layer Can Act Across Your Systems

Avatar photo

Anas T

Sep 1, 2026

Traditional integration is built for data exchange. An agentic TMS needs action authorisation. What tool use, memory, and goal-directed execution change about architecture, workflows, and the operator's job.

Read more

General

Last-Mile Delivery for Quick Commerce: Why Sub-30-Minute Promises Break the Density Model in 2026

Avatar photo

Ishan Bhattacharya

Sep 2, 2026

Quick commerce last-mile delivery is not faster last-mile delivery. Below thirty minutes the batching that makes the last mile affordable becomes unavailable, and the economics move elsewhere.

Read more

Fleet Utilization and the Cost of Idle Time: A CFO Framework for Fresh Produce Peak Shipping

  • Share iconShare
    • facebook iconFacebook
    • Twitter iconTwitter
    • Linkedin iconLinkedIn
    • Email iconEmail
  • Print iconPrint
  • Download iconDownload
  • Schedule a Demo
glossary sidebar image

Is your team spending more time on fixing logistics plan than running the operation?

  • Agentic transportation management from order intake to freight settlement
  • Route optimization built on 250+ real-world constraints
  • AI-driven dispatch with automatic execution handling
20% Cost Reduction
66% Faster Planning Cycles
Schedule a demo

Insights Worth Your Time

General

Locus 2026 US Consumer Survey: Generative AI isn’t Just Changing How Consumers Shop, it’s Breaking the Demand Patterns US Retail Was Built On

Avatar photo

Ishan Bhattacharya

May 29, 2026

General

Embedded vs Bolted-On AI: The Architecture Question European Logistics Buyers Are Asking

Avatar photo

Aseem Sinha

May 21, 2026

General

Hybrid Fleet Management: How Owned, 3PL, Gig, ICE, and EV Capacity Actually Operate at Most Enterprises

Avatar photo

Aseem Sinha

May 7, 2026

General

US Returns Hit $850 Billion in 2025: Why US Retailers Are Restructuring Reverse Logistics in 2026

Avatar photo

Ishan Bhattacharya

May 7, 2026

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Stay up to date with the latest marketing, sales, and service tips and news

Locus Logo
Subscribe to our newsletter
Platform
  • Transportation Management System
  • Last Mile Delivery Solution
  • Fulfillment Automation
  • Dispatch Planning
  • Delivery Orchestration
  • Track and Trace
  • Analytics and Insights
Industries
  • Retail
  • FMCG/CPG
  • 3PL & CEP
  • Big & Bulky
  • E-commerce
  • E-grocery
  • Industrial Services
  • Manufacturing
  • Home Services
Resources
  • Use Cases
  • Whitepapers
  • Case Studies
  • E-books
  • Blogs
  • Reports
  • Events & Webinars
  • Videos
  • API Reference Docs
  • Glossary
Company
  • About Us
  • Customers
  • Analyst Recognition
  • Careers
  • News & Press
  • Trust & Security
  • Contact Us
  • Hey AI, Learn About Us
  • LLM Text
ISO certificates image
youtube linkedin twitter-x instagram

© 2026 Mara Labs Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy and Terms

locus-logo

Cut last mile delivery costs by 20% with AI-Powered route optimization

1.5B+Deliveries optimized

99.5%SLA Adherences

30+countries

Trusted by 360+ enterprises worldwide

Get a Complimentary Tailored Route Simulation

locus-logo

Reduce dispatch planning time by 75% with Locus DispatchIQ

1.5B+Deliveries optimized

320M+Savings in logistics cost

30+countries served

Trusted by 360+ enterprises worldwide

Get a Complimentary Tailored Route Simulation

locus-logo

Locus offers Enterprise TMS for high-volume, complex operations

1.5B+Deliveries optimized

320M+Savings in logistics cost

30+countries served

Trusted by 360+ enterprises worldwide

Get a Complimentary Network Impact Assessment

locus-logo

Trusted by 360+ enterprises to slash costs and scale operations

1.5B+Deliveries optimized

320M+Savings in logistics cost

30+countries served

Trusted by 360+ enterprises worldwide

Get a Complimentary Enterprise Logistics Assessment